Mass. Gov. says casino law working as it shouldBy BOB SALSBERG , Associated Press
Nov. 20, 2013 5:44 PM ET
BOSTON (AP) — Gov. Deval Patrick insisted Wednesday the state's casino gambling law was "working exactly as it was supposed to," and that he was not surprised by several recent votes against proposed gambling facilities.
The latest was in Milford, where on Tuesday about 65 percent of voters who cast ballots in a binding referendum said no to a $1 billion resort casino plan offered by Foxwoods.
The vote came on the heels of rejections of proposed casinos earlier this month by voters in East Boston and Palmer, and in September by West Springfield voters. Those results leave the prospect that only a handful — if any — developers will be left to compete for the eastern and western regional resort casino licenses that the Massachusetts Gaming Commission could award next year.
On Wednesday, a group seeking to repeal the casino law said it had filed more than 90,000 signatures with city and town clerks around the state in the hopes of putting the question before voters on the November 2014 ballot.
Patrick told reporters that he's had no second thoughts about signing the casino bill into law and did not want to see it repealed.
"I think it is working exactly as it was supposed to, which was to authorize up to three destination resort licenses and one (slots parlor) and to let people make their own decisions about whether they want the facilities in their own communities," the governor said.
Patrick and other supporters of the law have said that the recent string of anti-casino votes is a validation of the law's provision that requires local approval for any casino projects, and they have also pointed out that several communities, including Everett, Springfield and Revere, have voted to welcome resort casinos.
Casino gambling can still succeed in Massachusetts, he said.
"I think this is something we can do well if we do it the right way. This has never been central to our economic growth strategy," Patrick said after swearing in newly-elected state Sen. Donald Humason, R-Westfield.
The group Repeal the Casino Deal needed the certified signatures of at least 68,911 registered voters to keep the proposed ballot question in play for next year's state election.
By filing more than 90,000 signatures before Wednesday's 5 p.m. deadline, the group said it hoped to have a sufficient number to withstand the loss of any signatures that might be challenged or disqualified for any reason.
David Guarino, a spokesman for the group, said the recent votes against casino projects have energized the repeal effort.
"We're still David taking on the deep-pocketed casino industry Goliath but, after East Boston, Palmer and Milford just last night, Goliath is more than knocked down," he said. "We hope the signatures put us in a strong position to deliver the knockout blow."
In addition to the signatures, the group may also need a ruling from the state's highest court allowing the repeal question to appear on the ballot. Attorney General Martha Coakley has said that it would violate a constitutional provision against the taking of private property.
Associated Press writer Steve LeBlanc contributed to this report.